Common SOAP Note Mistakes to Avoid in 2026
Updated January 2026
Documentation errors can lead to claim denials, audit recoupments, liability exposure, and compromised patient care. Understanding common pitfalls—especially with the rise of AI documentation—helps you avoid costly mistakes. Here are the most common SOAP note mistakes and how to fix them.
Overview: Why Documentation Matters
Poor documentation can result in:
- Claim denials (3-5% of claims denied for documentation issues)
- Audit recoupments (average recovery: $30,000-$100,000 per audit)
- Malpractice liability (incomplete notes harm legal defense)
- Care gaps (subsequent providers miss critical information)
- Compliance violations (HIPAA, billing fraud, etc.)
Subjective Section Mistakes
Mistake #1: Vague Chief Complaint
Wrong:
"Patient here for follow-up"
Right:
"Patient here for hypertension follow-up and new complaint of headaches x 1 week"
Why it matters: The chief complaint drives medical necessity. Vague complaints don't support the level of service billed.
Mistake #2: Copy-Forward Without Updating
Wrong:
[Exact same HPI from previous visit copy-pasted]
Right:
Update with current status, changes, response to treatment, and new information.
Why it matters: Copy-forward without meaningful updates is a major audit red flag and can constitute fraud.
Mistake #3: Missing Pertinent Negatives
Wrong:
"Patient has chest pain."
Right:
"Patient has chest pain. Denies shortness of breath, diaphoresis, nausea, radiation to arm or jaw, and recent illness."
Why it matters: Pertinent negatives document your clinical reasoning and differential consideration.
Objective Section Mistakes
Mistake #4: "WNL" or "Normal" Without Specifics
Wrong:
"HEENT: WNL"
Right:
"HEENT: Normocephalic, atraumatic. PERRL. TMs clear bilaterally with normal landmarks. Oropharynx clear, no erythema or exudate."
Why it matters: "WNL" doesn't document what you actually examined or found. Auditors and attorneys need specifics.
Mistake #5: Exam Doesn't Match Billing Level
Wrong:
Billing 99214 with documented exam: "General: NAD. Lungs: CTA. CV: RRR."
Right:
Match exam comprehensiveness to billing level, or use time-based coding with documented time.
Why it matters: E/M coding requires documentation support. Underdocumented exams lead to downcoding or denials.
Assessment Section Mistakes
Mistake #6: Diagnosis Doesn't Match Documentation
Wrong:
Subjective: "Patient feels fine, here for annual exam"
Assessment: "Uncontrolled diabetes, hypertensive urgency, unstable angina"
Right:
Ensure S and O support your A. If you're assessing unstable conditions, document the supporting findings.
Why it matters: Auditors verify that documented findings support diagnoses. Mismatches trigger reviews.
Mistake #7: Missing ICD-10 Specificity
Wrong:
"Type 2 diabetes"
Right:
"Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (E11.9)" or with appropriate complication codes.
Why it matters: Specific coding supports reimbursement and creates accurate clinical records.
Plan Section Mistakes
Mistake #8: Medications Without Complete Details
Wrong:
"Start Lisinopril"
Right:
"Start Lisinopril 10mg PO daily for hypertension. E-prescribed to CVS. Discussed potential side effects including cough and importance of avoiding potassium supplements."
Why it matters: Complete medication documentation prevents errors and supports medical necessity.
Mistake #9: No Return Precautions
Wrong:
"Follow up in 2 weeks"
Right:
"Follow up in 2 weeks. Return sooner if: chest pain worsens, shortness of breath develops, fever over 101°F, or any concerning symptoms."
Why it matters: Return precautions document patient education and reduce liability for adverse outcomes.
AI Documentation Mistakes (NEW for 2026)
With 66% of physicians using AI tools, new error patterns have emerged:
Mistake #10: Not Reviewing AI-Generated Notes
Wrong:
Signing AI-generated notes without review.
Right:
Always review AI drafts for accuracy before signing. You are legally responsible for the final note.
Why it matters: AI can hallucinate information, mishear details, and make errors. The signing provider is responsible.
Mistake #11: AI Hallucinations
Common AI hallucinations to watch for:
- Exam findings you didn't perform ("Lungs clear bilaterally" when you didn't listen)
- Medications not discussed
- Patient statements not made
- Review of systems items not asked
Solution: Always cross-reference AI-generated content with what actually occurred.
Mistake #12: Missing Patient Consent for AI
Wrong:
Using AI scribe without patient awareness.
Right:
Document: "Patient consented to AI-assisted documentation"
Why it matters: Patients have the right to know their visit is being recorded by AI. Some may decline.
Learn more: AI-Assisted Documentation Guide
Telehealth Documentation Mistakes (2026 Updates)
Mistake #13: Missing Telehealth Required Elements
Per CMS 2026 rules, telehealth notes must document:
- Patient location (state)
- Provider location
- Platform used
- Consent for telehealth
- Identity verification method
- Audio-only justification (if applicable)
Learn more: Telehealth SOAP Notes Guide
Quick Reference: Documentation Checklist
Resources
- SOAP Notes Templates 2026 - Compliant templates
- AI-Assisted Documentation Guide - AI best practices
- Telehealth SOAP Notes Guide - Telehealth requirements
- How to Write SOAP Notes Faster - Efficiency tips
- All Specialty Guides - Specialty-specific guidance
Frequently Asked Questions
The most common SOAP note errors include: (1) Vague chief complaints without duration or specifics, (2) Copy-forward without updating for the current visit, (3) Using 'WNL' or 'normal' without describing what was examined, (4) Missing pertinent negatives in the history, (5) Diagnosis-documentation mismatch where findings don't support the assessment, (6) Incomplete medication details, and (7) No return precautions or safety net instructions. With AI documentation, new errors include not reviewing AI-generated content and missing AI consent documentation.
Insurance companies reject SOAP notes for: insufficient documentation to support medical necessity, E/M code that doesn't match documentation level, missing required elements (like telehealth consent or location), diagnosis codes that don't match documented findings, copy-pasted notes from previous visits, incomplete procedure documentation, missing referring provider information for specialty visits, and lack of clinical reasoning in the assessment. To avoid rejections, ensure every diagnosis has supporting documentation in the S and O sections.
To pass documentation audits: (1) Document specific findings, not just 'WNL', (2) Include pertinent negatives that show differential consideration, (3) Ensure your Assessment is supported by Subjective and Objective findings, (4) Use specific ICD-10 codes with laterality and specificity, (5) Document time if using time-based coding, (6) Include complete medication details (drug, dose, frequency, route, indication), (7) Avoid identical copy-forward text, (8) Document patient education provided, and (9) For telehealth, include all required elements (platform, locations, consent).
Copy-forward abuse occurs when providers copy text from previous notes without meaningful updates for the current encounter. This creates several problems: notes don't reflect the actual visit, can constitute fraud if billing for services not rendered, creates clinical safety risks when outdated information persists, and is a major audit red flag. Acceptable use of copy-forward includes bringing forward chronic conditions or stable histories, but the current visit's HPI, exam, and plan should always be freshly documented.
Documentation errors that increase malpractice risk include: failure to document informed consent discussions, missing return precautions or safety net instructions, incomplete medication reconciliation, undocumented patient non-compliance, failure to document abnormal results follow-up, missing differential diagnosis documentation, incomplete documentation of clinical reasoning, and failure to document specialist referral recommendations. In malpractice cases, the principle 'if it wasn't documented, it wasn't done' often applies.
Instead of 'WNL' or 'normal,' document specifically what you examined and found. For example, instead of 'HEENT: WNL,' write 'HEENT: Normocephalic, atraumatic. PERRL. TMs clear bilaterally. Oropharynx without erythema or exudate. Mucous membranes moist.' This demonstrates you performed the exam, provides baseline for future comparison, and supports your billing level. Only document exam components you actually performed.
Common AI scribe documentation errors include: (1) Not reviewing AI-generated notes before signing (you're legally responsible), (2) AI hallucinations—exam findings you didn't perform or statements not made, (3) Missing patient consent for AI documentation, (4) Over-reliance on AI leading to incomplete notes, and (5) Not correcting formatting or terminology errors. To minimize errors, use a reliable HIPAA-compliant tool like SOAPNoteAI.com that generates accurate, structured notes. Always cross-reference AI output with what actually occurred during the visit before signing.
Telehealth claims are denied for: missing patient location (state), missing provider location, no documentation of platform used, missing consent for telehealth services, using incorrect place of service code, missing modifier (-95 or -93), audio-only visits without documented justification (after 1/31/2026), mental health visits without required in-person visit documentation, and failure to document exam limitations due to virtual format. Use a telehealth-specific template to ensure all required elements are captured.
Medical Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and should not replace professional medical judgment. Always consult current clinical guidelines and your institution's policies.
Create Your SOAP Note in 2 Minutes
Start with 20 free SOAP notes. No credit card required.